Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews on Nursing Interventions for Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Analysis.

Background: This study aimed to assess the conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews (CRs) in oncology nursing. Methods: We searched systematically for all CRs published in the Cochrane Library in the oncology nursing field between January 2014 and April 2023. We analyzed the difference between conclusive and inconclusive outcomes using the χ2 and Mann-Whitney U-tests and identified 430 articles. However, we excluded 385 articles after reviewing their titles and abstracts. We assessed 45 full-text articles for eligibility and identified 32 articles. Of the 32 articles, we extracted 19 interventions. Results: The overall outcomes were 182 cases, with 51.6% (n = 94) and 48.4% (n = 88) demonstrating conclusiveness and inconclusiveness, respectively. Regarding conclusiveness, 28.0% (n = 51) and 23.6% (n = 43) reported that the studied interventions were effective and ineffective, respectively. We found that studies on interventions related to physical activity and yoga had significantly high rates of conclusive. Compared with inconclusiveness outcomes, conclusive outcomes involved significantly more studies (p < 0.001) and patients (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Ultimately, these findings reveal that in the oncology nursing field, only 51% of the main outcomes of each nursing intervention in CRs were conclusive.

Intensive Care Unit Nurses' Professional Autonomy: A Scoping Review.

Intensive care unit (ICU) nurses' professional autonomy is a critical factor affecting their ability to sustainably provide high-quality care to patients who are critically ill and to their families. However, in the absence of a systematic or scoping review of ICU nurses' professional autonomy, limited information and evidence are available on this topic. The aim of this scoping review was to clarify the extent and type of evidence on ICU nurses' professional autonomy. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The following research questions were addressed: (1) Which areas of interest and trends regarding ICU nurses' professional autonomy have been explored in studies published in scientific journals? And (2) What is known about ICU nurses' professional autonomy? The data sources included MEDLINE, CINAHL Ultimate, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web of the Japan Medical Abstracts Society databases. Identified studies were mapped based on their aim, design, methodology, and key findings and categorized according to their focus areas. Of the 734 identified studies, 16 were analyzed. The identified categories were as follows: "relationship between professional autonomy and mental issues," "experiences and processes of exercising professional autonomy," "relationship between professional autonomy and nurse-physician collaboration," "relationship between professional autonomy and demographic characteristics," "concept of professional autonomy," "barriers to professional autonomy," and "team approach to improve professional autonomy." Most studies have focused on the relationship between professional autonomy and mental health issues and nurse-physician collaboration and few included interventions to enable or promote the exercise of professional autonomy, highlighting a research gap. Future research should identify factors that inhibit the professional autonomy of ICU nurses and that can be changed through interventions and should develop educational and organizational change-based interventions to modify the factors.

Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Family Nursing: A Meta-research Study.

This study established the clinical conclusiveness of Cochrane reviews (CRs) in family nursing. We extracted relevant characteristics of CRs to determine the methods of obtaining high-level evidence for family nursing. We performed a systematic search of all CRs on family nursing published in the Cochrane Library between January 2014 and April 2023. After screening 1212 titles and abstracts, we identified seven potentially relevant articles. Upon reviewing their full texts, we included six CRs with a total of 34 interventions. Of these, 22 (64.7%) interventions were conclusive and 12 (55%) were inconclusive. Thus, the number and percentage of conclusive CRs is lower in family nursing versus other fields.

Development and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Questionnaire on Factors That Influence Family Engagement in Acute Care Settings.

There exists an international consensus on the importance of family-centered care (FCC) in intensive care settings and the evaluation of collaboration between nurses and families; however, FCC is currently practiced blindly in Japan. In this study, we developed a Japanese version of the questionnaire, Factors that Influence Family Engagement (QFIFE-J) and examined its reliability and validity. A web-based survey was conducted with 250 nurses working in the intensive care unit (ICU). Exploratory and validatory factor analyses were used to ascertain factor validity. Criterion-related validity was tested using correlation analysis with the ICU Nurses' Family Assistance Practice Scale. Internal consistency and reproducibility were verified for reliability. Following exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, a 15-item measure emerged comprising four factors: "ICU environment", "nurses' attitudes", "nurses' workflow", and "patient acuity". Confirmatory factor analyses showed a generally good fit. Cronbach's α for the overall scale was 0.78, indicating acceptable internal consistency. The intraclass coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.80. It was found that the QFIFE-J was reliable and valid and may help determine the factors that promote or inhibit FCC. Additionally, this study has also clarified the current status and family support related issues in ICUs in Japan.

Effect size estimates of risk factors for post-intensive care syndrome-family: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Families of patients admitted to ICUs often experience post-intensive care syndrome-family, and previous studies have reported several possible risk factors. However, to date, no meta-analyses have been conducted on the numerous risk factors associated with the development of post-intensive care syndrome-family and how strongly these factors are in association with post-intensive care syndrome-family. OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for post-intensive care syndrome-family and determine the effect size of individual risk factors. METHODS: This systematic review used MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE databases to search all studies through December 1, 2021, that reported risk factors for anxiety, depression, PTSD, and prolonged grief disorder in the families of adult patients in ICUs. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate an overall estimate for key risk factors, and odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were used as summary statistics using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Of 2964 identified studies, 17 were included. Nine factors for anxiety, eight for depression, and three for PTSD were assessed using results from 13 studies. The risk factor with the largest effect size was "history of mental illness," which, along with "female sex," was a significant risk factor common to anxiety, depression, and PTSD. "Poor communication with ICU staff," "severely ill patient," and "patients' spouse" were common risk factors for anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several risk factors related to patient and family demographic characteristics. Further research is required to identify and validate modifiable risk factors for the psychosocial experiences of families of ICU patients.

How has the COVID-19 pandemic influenced nursing students' academic experience and career choices? A qualitative descriptive analysis.

COVID-19 control measures influenced education and training environments and profoundly impacted nursing students' career prospects and academic lives. This study intends to elucidate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nursing students' academic experience and career choices. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted at a 4-year university in Japan, using semi-structured interviews with 14 nursing students. Sandelowski's qualitative descriptive analysis was conducted. We identified 11 categories that summarize COVID-19's influence on students' academic experience and career choices: "Forced change to a new learning system," "Difficult learning thoroughly with restricted face-to-face interactions," "Worries regarding teacher evaluations when face-to-face interactions are restricted," "Adapting to changes in the learning environment," "Finding new ways to learn due to the different learning environment," "Worries regarding career decision-making after losing opportunities to obtain career information," "Fully utilizing limited information resources in deciding where to work while being influenced by others," "Coping with a confusing new job hunting system," "Worries about becoming a nurse without enough practical experience," "Conscious of working as a nurse while facing infections," and "Support from those around me is helpful in an unfamiliar environment." The categories comprised four elements: academic impact, employment/career impact, future impact on working as a nurse, and environmental support. Building an online education/training program, ensuring the availability of regular psychological support, providing abundant information on employment, installing an information desk, and providing regular feedback were considered imperative for supporting nursing students.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of nursing students in Japan: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of the prolonged coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on the mental health of nursing students is unclear. This study assesses the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nursing students in Japan during the pandemic and determines the risk factors associated with such symptoms. METHODS: An online survey-based cross-sectional study was conducted from August 16 to October 16, 2021. Participants were first- to fourth-year nursing students enrolled in undergraduate programs at the eight universities in Japan. Anxiety, depression, and insomnia were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Insomnia Severity Index-7, respectively. We calculated descriptive statistics for each measurement item and performed univariate and logistic regression analyses to evaluate the potential risk factors. RESULTS: We received responses from 1,222 of 3,056 nursing students (response rate: 40.0%). After 25 participants were excluded due to missing outcome values, 1,197 students (valid response rate: 98.0%) were included in the analysis. The prevalence of anxiety, depression, and insomnia was 4.8%, 12.4%, and 18.0%, respectively. The risk of anxiety was lower among participants who did not have any relatives or friends who had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 than among those who did (aOR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.94). The risk of depression was higher among participants whose financial status had worsened during the pandemic than among those whose financial status had not changed (aOR 3.44; 95% CI 1.98-5.96). Common factors that increased the risk of anxiety, depression, and insomnia were life satisfaction and fear of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Mental health-related symptoms among nursing students in Japan have not necessarily worsened with the spread of COVID-19 but were exacerbated by the intensity of changes in daily living and fear, which are psychosocial effects associated with the pandemic.

Experiences of COVID-19-Related Stigma: A Qualitative Study on Nurses Caring for Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers caring for patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been a primary target of stigmatization and discrimination during the COVID-19 outbreak. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop a support system for Asian healthcare workers who care for patients with COVID-19. PURPOSE: This study was designed to understand the characteristics of COVID-19-related stigma experienced by nurses caring for patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A qualitative content analysis methodology was used. This study was conducted between April 2020 and March 2021. The participants were 10 female registered nurses working at three medical facilities that accepted patients with COVID-19. The data included specific narratives on the instances of stigma experienced when caring for patients with COVID-19, including connected situations and ideas. The data were collected using focus group interviews with three or four participants in each group. Data analysis was conducted based on the inductive qualitative analysis approach of Krippendorff. RESULTS: The content analysis identified two categories and seven subcategories of stigma experienced by clinical nurses. The category "directly experienced prejudice and discrimination" included the subcategories "being avoided," "being treated as dirty," "discrimination toward family members," and "others prying." The category "self-imposed coping behavior" included the subcategories "keeping oneself apart," "feeling guilty," and "nondisclosure." CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The participants internalized their experiences of stigma, as Japanese culture emphasizes keeping such things to oneself. Therefore, there is an urgent need to strengthen the support system for nurses who care for patients with COVID-19. This study addressed the problem of the stigmatization of these nurses and their families by others as well as their colleagues. The main findings were that stigma was directly experienced as discrimination and prejudice and often resulted in self-imposed coping behavior. The major implication of these findings is the need to establish systematic, active, and ongoing organizational support programs for nurses who are discriminated against because of COVID-19-related stigma.

Development and Validation of the COVID-19-Related Stigma Scale for Healthcare Workers (CSS-HCWs).

Stigma among healthcare workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an issue that requires immediate attention, as it may otherwise lead to the collapse of healthcare systems. In this study, we developed the COVID-19-related stigma scale for healthcare workers (CSS-HCWs) and assessed its reliability and validity. Data were collected online from 500 participants, including physicians and nurses involved in COVID-19 care. The first item of the draft scale was developed based on a literature review and qualitative study. The draft scale consisted of 24 items, which were rated on a six-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were calculated and the data distribution was analyzed. To assess the scale's validity and reliability, structural validity was evaluated through an exploratory factor analysis. Criterion-related validity was examined through a correlation analysis using the E16-COVID19-S, a COVID-19 scale developed for physicians in Egypt. Reliability was evaluated by examining the scale's stability and internal consistency. The findings revealed that the stigma scale was a valid and reliable instrument. The final scale consisted of 18 items across three domains: personal stigma, concerns of disclosure and others, and family stigma. In conclusion, the scale is a valid and reliable instrument that can measure COVID-19-related stigma among healthcare workers.

Families' experiences of grief and bereavement in the emergency department: A scoping review.

AIM: Death is a frequent event in the emergency department, and many family members experience grief and bereavement. However, little is known about what families experience. The aim of this study was to explore previous findings about families' experiences of grief and bereavement in the emergency department to clarify and understand their experience. METHODS: A scoping review was chosen as the design for this research. Studies were searched from four electronic databases. The obtained studies were screened independently by two reviewers and selected by mutual agreement of the entire team based upon the eligibility criteria. All relevant data were extracted, and thematic analysis was conducted to assess families' grief and bereavement experiences in the emergency department. RESULTS: The database searches initially resulted in 982 studies; these were finally narrowed to 20 studies for data extraction. Publication years ranged from 1987 to 2020. The studies were conducted across nine countries; most were from the United States and had a qualitative research design. Analysis elicited the following themes: "lack of information," "breaking bad news," "being present during resuscitation," "chaotic environment," "psychosocial reaction in bereavement," and "support and care needs from healthcare professionals." CONCLUSION: These themes reveal challenges in providing support and care from emergency nurses to bereaved families, including inadequate provision of information, poor design of the emergency department due to the lack of privacy, and families' unmet support and care needs. Emergency nurses need to better understand families' experience of grief and bereavement.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health of nursing students in Japan: protocol for a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is spreading globally with a high risk of mortality. It is also significantly affecting mental health. For nursing students, the impact of COVID-19 on mental health is predicted to be significant; however, sufficient data have not been obtained. Therefore, this study will aim to assess the mental health of nursing students and evaluate the related factors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This proposed study is a cross-sectional survey using a self-report questionnaire. An online questionnaire will be distributed among all nursing students of eight universities in Japan. The survey questionnaire will consist of questions related to demography, life satisfaction, fear of COVID-19, mental health and physical activities. The target sample size is 1300 nursing students. We will calculate descriptive statistics for each measurement item and perform univariate and logistic regression analyses to evaluate the potential risk factors for anxiety, depression and insomnia symptoms in nursing students. The strength of association will be assessed using the OR and its 95% CIs. Statistical significance will be set at a p<0.05. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Hyogo on 22 March 2021 (ID: 2020F29). In addition, all of the participating facilities required ethical approval from their local IRBs. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. We believe that the proposed large-scale investigation of the mental health of nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic and the relationship between mental health and fear of COVID-19 are novel and will be a strength of this study.